Totally endoscopic concomitant aortic and mitral valve surgery in junctional epidermolysis bullosa: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Junctional epidermolysis bullosa is a rare skin and mucosal disorder characterized by blister formation in response to minor trauma and extracutaneous manifestations. There have been no reports of cardiac surgery and prognostication in patients with epidermolysis bullosa due to skin and mucosal fragility. CASE PRESENTATION: A 55-year-old man presented with congenital junctional epidermolysis bullosa, hypertension, and vasospastic angina. He complained of dyspnea on exertion, and transthoracic echocardiography revealed severe aortic valve regurgitation, moderate aortic valve stenosis (tricuspid valve), and severe mitral valve regurgitation. Considering that the skin condition in the right chest wall was relatively healthy, the right thoracotomy approach was preferred and totally endoscopic concomitant mitral valve repair and aortic valve replacement were performed using a sutureless bioprosthetic valve (Perceval™ (Corcym, Group, Milan, Italy)). Polyurethane and silicon dressing foams were used to protect the skin at the site of contact with the bag valve mask, arterial pressure catheter, intravenous catheter, and the tracheal intubation tube. Vertical mattress sutures were used for the skin sutures. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged nine days after the operation. There was no indication for reoperation until three years follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The totally endoscopic concomitant aortic and mitral valve surgery using Perceval™ prosthesis can be performed safely in patients with junctional epidermolysis bullosa by adequate protection of the skin and mucosa.

Impact of the Lumbar Arteries on Aneurysm Diameter and Type 2 Endoleak after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is recommended to prevent type 2 endoleak (T2EL). However, the impact of patent lumbar arteries (LAs) on T2ELs and aneurysm diameter has not been elucidated. METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive patients who underwent EVAR at our institution between January 2013 and September 2022 and whose IMA had been occluded preoperatively or newly occluded postoperatively were included in the study. Predictive factors for aneurysm sac enlargement, sac shrinkage, and T2EL were investigated. RESULTS: T2ELs occurred in 22.8% of the patients. The 4-year cumulative incidence rates of sac enlargement and shrinkage were 6.7% and 64.6%, respectively. The number of postoperative patent LAs was identified as a risk factor for T2ELs (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.54-12.7, P = 0.0065). The number of postoperative patent LAs was found to be a significant predictor of sac enlargement (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 3.15, 95% CI: 1.43-6.96, P = 0.0045) and shrinkage (AHR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.43-0.91, P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated that the number of postoperative patent LAs had a significant impact on the development of T2ELs and the change in aneurysm diameter in patients in whom the IMA was occluded after EVAR.

Effects of Low-Dose Tolvaptan for Fluid Management After Cardiovascular Surgery.

Background: Perioperative management of body fluid levels after cardiovascular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass is essential. Fluid management using tolvaptan with conventional diuretics is effective in maintaining urine output without worsening renal function. This study aimed to improve the in-out balance in the early perioperative phase using low-dose tolvaptan (3.75 mg/day). Methods and Results: This prospective, single-center, randomized, open-label study included 199 patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital between September 2018 and December 2020. Treatment with tolvaptan and loop diuretics (tolvaptan group; 99 patients) was compared with treatment with loop diuretics alone (control group; 100 patients) to evaluate achievement of preoperative body weight as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were urine volume, the incidence of worsening renal function (WRF), and postoperative paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (POAF). There was no significant difference between groups in the return to preoperative body weight on postoperative Day 6. The tolvaptan group had significantly increased urine volume (2,530 vs. 2,150 mL/day) and decreased total furosemide dose (24 vs. 32 mg) compared with the control group. No significant differences were observed in the development of WRF and POAF between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Although low-dose tolvaptan administration did not shorten the time to achieving preoperative body weight, it did significantly increase urine volume without WRF and POAF.

Contemporary outcomes of mitral valve replacement in octogenarians.

AIM OF THE STUDY: We aimed to determine the outcomes of contemporary mitral valve replacement (MVR) in octogenarians, for rational treatment selection in a patient cohort. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2018, 656 consecutive MVRs were performed. Among these cases, 109 patients were aged 80 years or older, and 547 patients were younger than 80 years. Isolated MVRs were performed in 211 patients, of whom 36 were aged 80 years or older. Perioperative mortality and complications were compared between the two groups, adjusted by propensity score. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality of the entire MVR (<80: 26 [4.8%] vs. ≥80: 6 [5.5%], p = .81) and isolated MVR (<80: 6 [3.4%] vs. ≥80: 1 [2.8%], p > .99) groups were similar. Age >80 years did not influence in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-3.14, p = .9), stroke (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.19-6.71, p = .9), hemodialysis (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.45-4.66, p = .54), or prolonged ventilation (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.81-3.23, p = .18), but influenced the incidence of reopening for bleeding (HR, 3.97; 95% CI, 1.11-14.19, p = .03). Cox proportional hazard model results showed that age >80 years did not affect cardiac death (HR, 1.45, 95% CI: 0.67-3.12, p = .35), bleeding events (HR, 1.89, 95% CI: 0.84-4.27, p = .13), or stroke (HR, 1.51, 95% CI: 0.54-4.21, p = .44) during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The perioperative and follow-up outcomes of MVR in octogenarians were not inferior to those of younger patients. We should not hesitate to conduct MVR on the grounds of old age.

Short- and mid-term outcomes of the frozen elephant-trunk procedure for degenerative aortic arch aneurysm.

PURPOSE: The frozen elephant-trunk (FET) procedure is used widely in total aortic arch replacement (TAR) surgery; however, its safety, effectiveness, and long-term outcomes compared with those of the conventional elephant trunk (cET) procedure for degenerative aneurysms are unclear. METHODS: Between July, 2011 and August, 2019, 126 patients underwent elective total aortic arch replacement at our institution. We compared the short- and mid-term outcomes of 60 patients who underwent the FET procedure (FET group) with those of 66 patients who underwent cET (cET group). RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate tended to be lower in the FET group than in the cET group (p = 0.12). There were two cases of paraplegia (3.3%) in the FET group and in none in the cET group. The all-cause mortality at the 3-year follow-up did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.31). The FET group required more unexpected interventions at the surgical site in the mid-term period. CONCLUSIONS: FET was associated with a shorter operative time and lower surgical mortality than cET. Although the mid-term total aortic arch replacement outcomes of FET were acceptable, careful imaging observation is necessary because reinterventions were required more frequently.

[Surgical Excision of Calcified Amorphous Tumors on Mitral and Aortic Valves:Report of a Case].

Calcified amorphous tumor (CAT) is a nonneoplastic cardiac tumor that can be located in any of the four cardiac chambers, but is predominantly detected on the mitral valve. We report a rare case of CAT originating from the mitral and aortic valves. A 69-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus was referred to our hospital for the evaluation of cardiac masses found incidentally on screening transthoracic echocardiography. She had no symptoms, including fever and neurological deficits, and her blood cultures were negative. Echocardiography revealed mobile masses arising from the mitral and aortic valves. We performed surgical excision and histopathologically diagnosed the masses with cardiac CATs. Mobile and pedunculated CAT frequently causes systemic embolization, and thus, complete surgical excision is recommended in such a case.

Comparison of porcine versus bovine pericardial bioprosthesis in the mitral position.

BACKGROUND: There are no reports of midterm outcomes after mitral valve replacement with a 25-mm bioprosthesis in a large series of patients. This study aimed to examine perioperative and midterm outcomes of bioprosthetic valve choice, porcine or bovine pericardial, in the mitral position, focusing on 25-mm valves. METHODS: From 2007 to 2018, 467 patients received a mitral bioprosthesis, with or without concomitant procedures. Of these, 111 (23.8%) were porcine, and 356 (76.2%) were bovine pericardial, and 219 patients (46.9%) received a 25-mm valve. A propensity-matched cohort of 192 patients was used for outcome analyses. The influence of the valve type on midterm survival and incidence of cardiac death was assessed. Similarly, subanalysis stratified by valve size was conducted. RESULTS: In matched patients, there were no differences in midterm survival and incidence of cardiac death between the two groups (log-rank test; p = .268 and p = .097, respectively). There were no differences in midterm survival and incidence of cardiac death between the 25-mm valve and larger valve (log-rank test; p = .563 and p = .597, respectively). The Cox proportional-hazards model revealed that the valve type and 25-mm valve did not affect midterm survival (p = .487 and p = .375, respectively) and incidence of cardiac death (p = .678 and p = .562, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The choice of a porcine or bovine pericardial bioprosthesis does not affect midterm survival and cardiac death. The 25-mm valves, whether bovine or porcine, could be an appropriate alternative when the patient's body size is small.

Impact of the collateral network on central-repair-first strategy in superior mesenteric artery occlusion with type A acute aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVES: Surgery for acute type A aortic dissection with mesenteric malperfusion is challenging. Although the peripheral-reperfusion-first strategy has shown good results, more discussion regarding indicated patients is needed. This study aimed to describe the imaging features and surgical outcomes of mesenteric malperfusion and to clarify which cases should be considered for the peripheral-reperfusion-first strategy. METHODS: A total of 200 patients underwent emergent aortic repair for acute type A aortic dissection at our institution between October 2011 and July 2019. Superior mesenteric artery occlusion on preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography was detected in 12 patients, who were categorized into two groups based on enhancement (n = 7) or non-enhancement (n = 5) of the superior mesenteric artery peripheral branches. Operative outcomes after central repair were compared between groups. RESULTS: Four patients in the enhanced group had no postoperative abdominal complications, and three patients required superior mesenteric artery bypass grafting with the central-repair-first strategy. However, all patients in the enhanced group survived and did not require intestinal resection. In contrast, four patients (80%) in the non-enhanced group had intestinal necrosis, three patients required intestinal resection, and one patient died from multiple organ failure. CONCLUSION: The presence or absence of an enhancement of the peripheral superior mesenteric artery by the collateral network could be helpful for decision-making. The central-repair-first strategy may be permitted in patients with enhanced peripheral branches. Conversely, in patients with non-enhanced peripheral branches, a more invasive assessment should be considered before central aortic repair, and peripheral-reperfusion-first strategy may be required.

Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Mitral Valve Replacement: A Propensity Score Analysis.

The effect of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) on late outcomes after mitral valve replacement (MVR) remains unclear. We evaluated the impact of PPM after MVR on the late survival using propensity score matching analysis. From 2007 to 2018, 660 consecutive MVRs were performed. Effective orifice areas were obtained from a literature review of in vivo echocardiographic data, and mitral PPM was defined as an effective orifice area index of ≤1.2 cm2/m2. Propensity score matching yielded a cohort of 126 patients with PPM and 126 patients without PPM. Mitral PPM was found in 37.8% of the patients. In the whole matched patients, there were no differences in late survival (log-rank test, P = 0.629) between 2 groups. Patients aged ≤70 years and those aged >70 years had no differences in late survival (log-rank test, P = 0.073 and 0.572). The Cox proportional hazards model for the overall survival showed that mitral PPM tended to decrease survival in patients aged ≤70 years (P = 0.084, hazard ratio [HR] 2.647, 95% CI: 0.876-7.994). Mitral PPM did not adversely affect long-term survival. There may be a tendency of adverse impact on late survival in patients aged ≤70 years. Implanting a safe size rather than larger size prosthesis in mitral position may be an appropriate option in older patients.

Calcified amorphous tumor presenting with rapid growth in the ascending aorta.

A calcified amorphous tumor (CAT) is a rare, non-neoplastic cardiac mass frequently located in cardiac chambers, especially the mitral valve or annulus. Here, we report an exceedingly rare case of CAT as an atypical mobile mass in the ascending aorta in a 62-year-old man who was on hemodialysis for 11 years. The CAT grew rapidly within 3 months. We resected the mass, and he was discharged with no complications. This report shows that the CAT can grow rapidly, even in the aorta, and provides important information on the progression of this rare disease and its clinical features.

Incidence and influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch after reoperative aortic valve replacement: a retrospective single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Reoperative aortic valve replacement (AVR) is associated with increased mortality compared with initial surgery, and a smaller valve might be implanted during repeat AVR (re-AVR; AVR after prior AVR). We describe the clinical outcomes and incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatches (PPM) after reoperative AVR. METHODS: Among 113 patients who underwent reoperative AVR between 2007 and 2018, 44 underwent re-AVR and 69 underwent a first replacement of a diseased natural valve after any cardiac surgery except AVR (primary AVR). We then compared early and late outcomes, the impact of re-AVR on the effective orifice areas (EOA), and the incidence and influence of PPM on reoperative AVR. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 2.7%, and the overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 95, 91 and 86%, respectively. The reference EOA of the newly implanted valve was smaller than that of the previous valve (1.4 ± 0.3 vs. 1.6 ± 0.3 cm2, p < 0.01). The mean pressure gradient was greater (15.2 ± 6.4 vs. 12.7 ± 6.2 mmHg, p = 0.04) and indexed EOA was smaller (0.92 ± 0.26 vs. 1.06 ± 0.36 cm2/m2, p = 0.04) during re-AVR than primary AVR, whereas the incidence of PPM was similar (38.7% vs. 34.8%, p = 0.87) between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcomes of reoperative AVR were acceptable. Although the reference EOA of new implanted valves was smaller than that of previous valves, re-AVR did not increase the incidence of PPM. These findings might serve as a guide for future decisions regarding the surgical approach to treating degenerated prosthetic valves.

Open and endovascular thoracic aortic repair in patients with end-stage renal disease.

OBJECTIVES: The number of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients has increased, but there have been few reports of thoracic aortic surgery in patients with ESRD. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early and late outcomes of open and endovascular thoracic aortic repairs in patients with ESRD. METHODS: A total of 36 patients with ESRD who needed chronic haemodialysis undergoing open surgery (n = 21) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) (n = 15) of the thoracic aorta from 2007 to 2017 in our hospital were identified. Primary end points were in-hospital mortality and late survival; secondary end points were perioperative complications and late aortic events. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (39%) had aortic dissection, and 16 (44%) had aortic aneurysms. Emergency surgery was performed in 12 patients (33%). There were 3 hospital deaths (8%) (open surgery, n = 1, 5%; TEVAR, n = 2, 13%). The TEVAR group had fewer transfusions than the open surgery group and shorter intensive care unit and hospital stays. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 79%, 58% and 40%, respectively, for patients overall. Freedom from aortic events at 1 and 3 years was 97% and 92%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The early outcome of thoracic aorta surgery in patients with ESRD was acceptable. However, the long-term mortality in patients with ESRD was still poor. Therefore, whether to perform surgery needs to be considered carefully.

Abdominal surgery for gastric cancer following coronary artery bypass grafting using an in situ right gastroepiploic artery graft.

BACKGROUND: The right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) is often used for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in Japan. As gastric cancer has a high prevalence in many Asian countries, we investigated problems with surgery for gastric cancer after CABG using the RGEA. METHODS: A total of 860 patients underwent CABG using the RGEA between January 1997 and December 2006. Of these, 13 patients underwent surgery for gastric cancer after CABG. In all cases, the RGEA was harvested by the skeletonization technique, and an antegastric route was used for the anastomosis. RESULTS: Dissection for the No. 6 lymph node was not performed in all cases because of the risk of graft injury. Graft injury during gastric surgery occurred in one patient and post-operative ventricular fibrillation (VF) was observed in two patients. One case of hospital death due to VF and two cases of remote death were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: In planning a resection for gastric cancer following a CABG with a patent RGEA graft, the potential for graft injury must be anticipated. In advanced stages of gastric cancer when the RGEA needs to be resected to dissect the No.6 lymph node, a pre-operative percutaneous coronary intervention or a reoperative CABG may be indicated.

Left ventricular assist device exchange: the Toronto General Hospital experience.

BACKGROUND: As support times for left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) become longer, several complications requiring device exchange may occur. To our knowledge, this is the first Canadian report regarding implantable LVAD exchange. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of consecutive, unique patients implanted with an LVAD between June 2006 and October 2015 at Toronto General Hospital. RESULTS: In total, 122 patients were impanted with an LVAD during the study period. Eight patients required LVAD exchange, and 1 patient had 2 replacements (9 of 122, 7.3%). There were 7 HeartMate II (HMII), 1 HVAD and 1 DuraHeart pumps exchanged. Two of these exchanges occurred early at the time of initial implant, whereas 7 occurred late (range 8-623 d). Six exchanges were made owing to pump thrombosis. Of the 3 exchanges made for other causes, 1 HMII exchange was owing to a driveline fracture, 1 DuraHeart patient had early inflow obstruction requiring exchange to HMII at the initial implant, and the third had a suspected inflow obstruction with no evidence of thrombosis at the time of the procedure. The mean support time before exchange was 225 days, and time from exchange to transplant, death or ongoing support was 245 days. Three patients were successfully bridged to transplant, and at the time of data collection 2 were supported awaiting transplant. Three patients died after a mean duration of 394.3 days (range 78-673 d) of support postreplacement. Four cases were successfully performed using a subcostal approach. CONCLUSION: Pump thrombosis is the most common cause for LVAD exchange, which can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality. The subcostal approach may be the preferred procedure for an HMII exchange when indicated.

CONTEXTE: À mesure que la durée d'utilisation des dispositifs d'assistance ventriculaire gauche (DAVG) augmente, plusieurs complications nécessitant un remplacement du dispositif peuvent survenir. À notre connaissance, il s'agit du premier rapport canadien concernant le remplacement des DAVG implantables. MÉTHODES: Nous avons passé en revue de manière rétrospective les cas individuels consécutifs de patients à qui on a implanté un DAVG entre juin 2006 et octobre 2015 à l'Hôpital Général de Toronto. RÉSULTATS: En tout, 122 patients ont reçu un DAVG pendant la période de l'étude. Huit patients ont eu besoin d'un remplacement de DAVG et 1 patient a eu besoin de 2 remplacements (9 sur 122, 7,3 %). Sept dispositifs HeartMate II (HMII), 1 dispositif HVAD et 1 dispositif DuraHeart ont été remplacés. Deux de ces remplacements sont survenus peu de temps après la pose initiale du dispositif, tandis que les 7 autres se sont produits plus tardivement (dans les 8 à 623 jours suivants). Six remplacements ont été effectués en raison d'une thrombose de la pompe. Parmi les 3 remplacements effectués pour d'autres raisons, 1 dispositif HMII a été remplacé en raison d'un bris de la ligne d'activation, 1 dispositif DuraHeart a présenté une obstruction précoce du flux entrant nécessitant la pose d'un HMII dès l'implantation initiale, et le troisième présentait une obstruction présumée du flux entrant sans signe de thrombose au moment de l'intervention. La durée moyenne d'utilisation avant le remplacement du dispositif a été de 225 jours, et l'intervalle entre le remplacement et la transplantation, le décès ou la décision de maintenir l'assistance a été de 245 jours. L'appareil a permis une transition réussie jusqu'à la transplantation chez 3 patients, et au moment de la collecte des données, 2 patients porteurs d'un DAVG étaient en attente d'une transplantation. Trois patients sont décédés après une durée moyenne de 394,3 jours (entre 78 et 673 jours) d'assistance post-remplacement. Quatre remplacements ont été effectués avec succès par une approche sous-costale. CONCLUSION: La thrombose de la pompe est la cause la plus fréquente de remplacement d'un DAVG; le remplacement peut être effectué avec des taux de morbidité et de mortalité acceptables. L'approche sous-costale serait à privilégier lorsqu'un remplacement de HMII est indiqué.

Comparison of Radial Artery and Saphenous Vein Graft Stenosis More Than 5 Years After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

BACKGROUND: Graft stenosis may be associated with future graft failure. The purpose of this investigation was to compare graft stenosis between radial artery (RA) grafts and saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) at least 5 years postoperatively using the multicenter Radial Artery Patency Study (RAPS) data. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-four patients underwent late invasive angiography after coronary artery bypass operations. The study population consists of 163 patients with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 3 flow of both the RA graft and study SVGs. Angiograms were reviewed centrally and in a blinded fashion. Graft stenosis was recorded for the proximal anastomosis, graft body, and distal anastomosis; significant stenosis was defined as greater than or equal to 50%. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were reported in patients with and those without significant graft stenosis. RESULTS: There was no difference in significant graft stenosis of the patent RA grafts and SVGs (14 of 163 [8.6%] versus 19 of 163 [11.7%]) or in the proximal anastomosis (5 of 163 [3.1%] versus 5 of 163 [3.1%]), graft body (6 of 163 [3.7%] versus 13 of 163 [8.0%]), or distal anastomosis (4 of 163 [2.5%] versus 5 of 163 [3.1%]) considered separately. However, the overall burden of graft body disease was higher in SVGs (p = 0.03). MACE was higher in patients with significant graft stenosis than in patients without stenosis (10 of 28 [35.7%] versus 7 of 135 [5.2%]; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the rates of significant stenosis of patent RA grafts and SVGs more than 5 years postoperatively. However, the burden of graft body stenosis was less in RA grafts compared with SVGs, suggesting that the RA grafts will continue to outperform the SVGs late after operation.

A systematic review of transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease.

Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease (TA-GVHD) is a rare complication of blood transfusion. The clinicolaboratory features of TA-GVHD and the relative contributions of recipient and component factors remain poorly understood. We conducted a systematic review of TA-GVHD reports. The HLA relationship between donor and recipient was classified as D = 0 when no donor antigens were foreign to the recipient vs D ≥ 1 when ≥1 donor antigen disparity occurred. We identified 348 unique cases. Criteria for component irradiation were met in 48.9% of cases (34.5% immune-compromised, 14.4% related-donor), although nonirradiated components were transfused in the vast majority of these (97.6%). Components were typically whole blood and red cells. When reported, component storage duration was ≤10 days in 94%, and 23 (6.6%) were leukoreduced (10 bedside, 2 prestorage, and 11 unknown). Among 84 cases with HLA data available, the category of D = 0 was present in 60 patients (71%) at either HLA class I or II loci and was more common among recipients without traditional indications for component irradiation. These data challenge the historic emphasis on host immune defects in the pathogenesis of TA-GVHD. The dominant mechanism of TA-GVHD in both immunocompetent and compromised hosts is exposure to viable donor lymphocytes not recognized as foreign by, but able to respond against, the recipient.

The long-term impact of diabetes on graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a substudy of the multicenter Radial Artery Patency Study.

OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to determine the impact of diabetes on radial artery and saphenous vein graft occlusion and clinical outcomes more than 5 years after coronary artery bypass surgery in the multicenter Radial Artery Patency Study (NCT00187356). METHODS: A total of 529 patients aged less than 80 years with triple-vessel disease undergoing coronary bypass surgery participated in this study. Angiographic follow-up occurred more than 5 years after surgery with annual clinical follow-up. The primary objective was to compare the proportion of complete graft occlusion between radial artery and saphenous vein grafts among diabetic and nondiabetic persons. Additional objectives included determining predictors of complete graft occlusion and comparison of major adverse cardiac events defined by cardiac death, late myocardial infarction, and reintervention. RESULTS: There were 148 of 529 patients (27.8%) with diabetes; 269 patients (83/269 [30.9%] diabetic) underwent late angiography at mean of 7.7±1.5 years after surgery. In diabetic patients, the proportion of complete graft occlusion was significantly lower in the radial grafts (4/83 [4.8%]) than in the saphenous grafts (21/83 [25.3%]) (P=.0004), and this was similar in nondiabetic patients (P=.19). Multivariate modeling showed that the use of the radial artery and high-grade target vessel stenosis were protective against late graft occlusion, whereas female gender, smoking history, and elevated creatinine were associated with an increased risk; interaction between diabetic status and conduit type also was significant (P=.02). Major adverse cardiac events were higher in diabetic patients (23/148 [15.5%] vs 35/381 [9.2%], P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the radial artery should be strongly considered in diabetic patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery, especially with high-grade target vessel stenosis.

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review.

IMPORTANCE: Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death globally. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are the revascularization options for ischemic heart disease. However, the choice of the most appropriate revascularization modality is controversial in some patient subgroups. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the current evidence comparing the effectiveness of CABG surgery and PCI in patients with unprotected left main disease (ULMD, in which there is >50% left main coronary stenosis without protective bypass grafts), multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD), diabetes, or left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). EVIDENCE REVIEW: A search of OvidSP MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases between January 2007 and June 2013, limited to randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and meta-analysis of trials and/or observational studies comparing CABG surgery with PCI was performed. Bibliographies of relevant studies were also searched. Mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE, defined as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization) were reported wherever possible. FINDINGS: Thirteen RCTs and 5 meta-analyses were included. CABG surgery should be recommended in patients with ULMD, multivessel CAD, or LVD, if the severity of coronary disease is deemed to be complex (SYNTAX >22) due to lower cardiac events associated with CABG surgery. In cases in which coronary disease is less complex (SYNTAX ≤22) and/or the patient is a higher surgical risk, PCI should be considered. For patients with diabetes and multivessel CAD, CABG surgery should be recommended as standard therapy irrespective of the severity of coronary anatomy, given improved long-term survival and lower cardiac events (5-year MACCE, 18.7% for CABG surgery vs 26.6% for PCI; P = .005). Overall, the incidence of repeat revascularization is higher after PCI, whereas stroke is higher after CABG surgery. Current literature emphasizes the importance of a heart-team approach that should consider coronary anatomy, patient characteristics, and local expertise in revascularization options. Literature pertaining to revascularization options in LVD is scarce predominantly due to LVD being an exclusion factor in most studies. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Both CABG surgery and PCI are reasonable options for patients with advanced CAD. Patients with diabetes generally have better outcomes with CABG surgery than PCI. In cases of ULMD, multivessel CAD, or LVD, CABG surgery should be favored in patients with complex coronary lesions and anatomy and PCI in less complicated coronary disease or deemed a high surgical risk. A heart-team approach should evaluate coronary disease complexity, patient comorbidities, patient preferences, and local expertise.